Thin article repair
A controlled draft with clearer structure and examples.
View exampleTransparent SEO scoring for working drafts
SEO Blitz reviews a draft against a published v2.0 scoring model, shows the findings behind the score, and keeps the analysis workflow in your browser. It is an editing aid, not a ranking forecast.
Evidence / Labs
SEO Blitz Labs uses retained fixtures, repeated runs, and documented limits to show how the analyzer behaves. These are product studies, not ranking experiments.
Browse all Labs30 target rules reproduced after controlled fixture and harness remediation.
30 / 30 target rules View studyTwo controlled runs observed request traffic, storage, and persistence.
38 requests observed View study Verified study / six modesOne frozen draft scored from 87 to 95 as only the selected mode changed.
87–95 overall range View study Verified study / 50 casesOne frozen body held steady while title treatments moved the score by three points.
91–94 overall · 85–100 title alignment View study01 / Tool
Choose the content mode, add your draft, and review the findings behind the score.
Mode changes scoring weights, minimums, and required cues.
Paste a post, service page, product description, guide, or outline. HTML is stripped before counting words and terms.
Load a safe example
Examples stay in the browser and are only meant to demonstrate how the score reacts to common draft types.
Display feedback changes above 60 characters. Score deductions begin above 65.
The brief declares reader intent for this draft. It is not a prediction of search-engine intent.
Current draft autosaves in browser local storage. Named drafts are saved only when you choose Save draft.
Results update as you type. Use the score to choose the next edit, then read the draft like a human before publishing.
Analysis summary
Start with a useful draft. Add a title and draft to see the overall score, dimension breakdown, and prioritized findings.
Model note
Last updated: August 2026. The model reviews visible writing across eight dimensions: clarity, completeness, structure, readability, specificity, repetition, title alignment, and publication readiness. Findings adapt to the selected content mode.
Boundaries
Read the score
Ready
Start typing to analyze
85-100 is structurally strong, 70-84 is workable, 50-69 needs editing, and below 50 usually needs a deeper rewrite.
Primary result
The three highest-impact edits, ranked by severity. Tackle these before the score breakdown.
Insights
Term focus
Size reflects frequency in content. Treat this as a focus check, not a density target.
Run a draft to see the first structural reason behind the score.
Start with the largest structural issue, then reread the copy for accuracy and intent.
The score is not a ranking forecast and does not verify facts, links, technical SEO, or whether the page satisfies the searcher.
Copy or download the visible analyzer result. The tested analyzer workflow processed submitted draft content in the browser.
02 / Method
03 / Examples
Controlled demonstrations show how the analyzer reports findings for different content types.
A controlled draft with clearer structure and examples.
View exampleA controlled description focused on useful buyer details.
View exampleA controlled page that replaces repetition with practical context.
View example04 / Transparency
SEO Blitz publishes its scoring rules, mode weights, limitations, version history, controlled studies, and corrections.
SEO Blitz is a writing-review tool, not a ranking forecast. It does not measure live SERPs, off-page authority, technical SEO, or future search performance.
05 / Next step
Review the findings behind the score, then decide what the draft needs next.